Naturalistic speech intelligibility training
Naturalistic intervention is an approach that can be used by speech and language therapists to target children’s errors in speech and grammatical morphemes. This approach makes a distinction between speech intelligibility (i.e. the degree to which a child is understood) and speech accuracy (i.e. the correct production of individual phonemes). It is intended for use with children who have severe speech sound disorder who are difficult to understand.
-
Naturalistic speech intelligibility training
Naturalistic intervention is an approach that can be used by speech and language therapists to target children’s errors in speech and grammatical morphemes. This approach makes a distinction between speech intelligibility (i.e. the degree to which a child is understood) and speech accuracy (i.e. the correct production of individual phonemes). It is intended for use with children who have severe speech sound disorder who are difficult to understand.
Evidence Rating: Moderate
Read more
-
Cycles
The Cycles approach (Hodson and Paden, 1991) is a speech and language therapy technique and was initially developed for use with children who have speech that is very difficult to understand because of the large number of mistakes they make with different speech sounds. This includes children with severe expressive phonological impairments, children with developmental verbal dyspraxia, repaired cleft palate, hearing impairment with and without cochlear implant and learning difficulties.
Evidence Rating: Moderate
Read more
-
Read, Play, Learn (RPL) intervention
The aim of the vocabulary intervention is to develop the depth of vocabulary knowledge of low SES children aged 4-5 years old.
Evidence Rating: Indicative
Read more
-
Morpho-syntactic intervention
Morpho-syntactic intervention is an approach for speech and language therapists and/or specialist teachers to support the development of children’s sentence and word construction (syntax and morphology) (Haskill, Tyler, & Tolbert, 2001) which may also benefit their speech sound system (phonology) (Tyler et al, 2002; but Fey et al, 1994).
Evidence Rating: Moderate
Read more
-
My sentence builder
My Sentence Builder is a computer-assisted treatment (C-AT) programme for the remediation of expressive-grammar deficits in preschool children with expressive Specific language impairment (SLI) whose receptive language skills are within the normal range. My Sentence Builder features components for present progressive sentences, one of the earliest developmental sentence types acquired, which can be used to create grammatically correct sentences by a clinician–client dyad.
Evidence Rating: Indicative
Read more
-
Lidcombe Programme
The Lidcombe Programme is a behavioural treatment for young children who stutter. The program takes its name from the suburb of Sydney where the Australian Stuttering Research Centre at the University of Sydney is located.
Evidence Rating: Strong
Read more
-
Cued speech
The system of cued speech was designed primarily to help deaf and hearing impaired speakers to learn English, to help lip reading and to support the development of literacy. Cued speech is a system of hand shapes and hand positions used in combination with lip shapes to show all the different speech sounds.
Evidence Rating: Indicative
Read more
-
Core vocabulary
The Core Vocabulary approach (Crosbie, Holm & Dodd, 2005) is designed for use with children who have an inconsistent speech disorder (Dodd, 2005), i.e. many of their words are produced with inconsistent pronunciations but there are no signs of developmental verbal dyspraxia.
Evidence Rating: Moderate
Read more
-
Literate language intervention
Literate Language Intervention targets the literate language skills of preschool children with identified low oral language skills. Intervention focusses on both sentence- and narrative-level understanding of literate language concepts, and is delivered in four 3-week units, 12 weeks in total, 4 days per week in school by trained interventionists with a variety of teaching experience. The intervention evaluation is based on a US sample of children.
Evidence Rating: Moderate
Read more
